Next Monday, September 16, I will conclude my 2024 70 Days Project series of comments to the Lincoln City Council. This fourth in the series will attempt to connect the dots, from 9/11 to Covid, and put fluoridated drinking water in its proper context.
70 Days Project – 9/11 Tribute 2024
Disappeared like a bad special effect
Peter Jennings’ ABC crew reporting about one of the planes impact saying, “It disappeared like a bad special effect. Disappeared right into the building.”
BBC’s premature report of Building 7 collapse
Loose Change 9/11 and Loose Change, 2nd Edition
The BBC’s Jane Standley mistakenly reports the collapse of Building 7, the Solomon Brothers Building, over 20 minutes before it collapsed in free fall at 5:20 p.m. on 9/11.
BBC’s response to premature report and reference to Loose Change 9/11 Documentary. Facebook partner Poynter’s response
A 30 year-old conspiracy
Sheldon Memorial Art Gallery, 2009
Kerrey is questioned by We Are Change Los Angeles about 9/11. Quote from Part 3, 06:45 minute mark.
Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth
July 29, 2024 – Lincoln City Council Open Comment
I am here tonight to report good news that came about, in part, by the City’s Covid response resulting in an investigation I began early last year into of one of the most touted Public Health achievements of the 20th Century, fluoride.
Evidence in the federal case against the EPA shows not only that the Public Health claim that fluoride prevents cavities is false but that many harms come from ingesting very small amounts.
Last August I reported to this Council on these negative health effects and that Lincoln is over-fluoridating the water supply. As a reminder, the treatment chemical is called hydrofluosilicic acid, a hazardous waste by-product from industry. Once added, this chemical is not easily or inexpensively removed.
Last spring I sent a report, with a similar version of this graph, to the City with a request to reduce fluoride treatment levels. The City again denied my request citing a 40-year old Nebraska regulation setting the treatment level well above the 2015 CDC recommended 0.7 ppm. City treatment levels are consistently near 0.9 ppm with sample test results ranging from 0.7 to over 0.9 ppm. As a comparison, Lincoln’s 2023 water quality report treatment level goal was 0.8 to 1.5 ppm while the Omaha MUD target was 0.7 ppm. And you can see here the difference in the sample test result reported.
While the Legislatures HHS Committee did not act on LB1387 last session to fix this, the good news is that in May I sent a request to reduce the fluoride level to the Governor and the DHHS CEO. On May 30th, the state’s Public Health director signed this petition to amend the 40-year-old regulation to align with that nearly 10 year-old CDC recommendation.
At last check with Public Health, they do not have a schedule for drafting the amendment. I intend to keep you posted on progress.
August 12, 2024 – Lincoln City Council Open Comment
I’m here again today because of the City’s Covid response and many years of research into healing. Because of Covid, my intuition about the harms of wireless technology were refreshed and I set out to learn more. I then met a friend who, after many misdiagnoses, was diagnosed in 2013 with burns caused by radio frequency radiation from a smart meter. It took her several months to accept this diagnosis and to begin treating and healing her burns.
Since the invention of electricity, doctors have recorded the benefits and harms of electricity’s electromagnetic frequencies or EMFs. One example you might remember is the harm caused by the x-ray shoe-fitting fluoroscope of the 1920’s that took over 50 years to eliminate.
While there are many EMF benefits, industry and independent scientists disagree on safe levels. Compare the harmful effects of electricity recorded by 18th century physicians to Covid and long Covid symptoms from this 2023 Scientific American article. Effects like shortness of breath, chest pain and respiratory infection.
Since 2020 I’ve learned that an international commission (ICNIRP) and the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) deny such adverse health effects exist. However, as Aurthur Firstenburg explains in his book, “The Invisible Rainbow,” our world is an electrical circuit. Artificial, pulsed signals like those from wireless devices and cell towers disturb this circuit. In the body, Dr. Gerald Pollack discovered that this electrical circuit forms a gel that behaves like a battery delivering minerals and other compounds on a circuit to the smallest of capillaries. Pollack calls this gel the fourth phase of water.
The FCC protects our devices from static noise but our City/County legal council will advise us that the FCC, which is not a health agency, actually sets health and safety standards for RF radiation emissions and prohibits local governments from considering the health effects of cell tower radiation in zoning decisions.
To track RF radiation changes in Lincoln, I began monitoring my neighborhood in 2021, comparing my findings to the 2016 European Academy for Environmental Medicine guidelines. Here are the readings over three years – from green in some areas – which is better – to yellow and red indicating a potential for higher risk.
Please do read the warning that came with your cellphone and consider that, as I reported last month about fluoride, RF radiation as an environmental toxin.
Regarding fluoride, I am glad to report today that the draft fluoride regulation change has been posted to the Secretary of States docket with a public hearing scheduled for September 18th.
August 26, 2024 – Lincoln City Council Open Comment
I’m here again today because of the City’s Covid response and years of research into healing.
Last summer, a state senator told me that context doesn’t play a part in debate. I believe context matters. The censored story of medicating drinking water with fluoride chemicals is just one of many similarly censored stories covered over by propaganda and false flag attacks.
Here are just a few of the censored stories, stories of harm, that you would find little, if any, valid information in a regular Google search or a ChatGPT result: the healing nature of raw milk and the harm of pasteurization, the 150 year virus debate challenging the current “working hypothesis” that viruses exist and cause disease, the story of vaccine fraud and harms, and finally, stories of war.
Instead, the stories we hear are fear-inducing, many times horrific and vicious. Stories led by public-private partnerships, as U.S. Marine Corps major general, Smedley Butler, claimed in his 1935 book War is a Racket. Butler said that war was the only racket international in scope. Ninety years later, we can see how the racket has expanded. To be sure, many of the horrific stories are true but many are not. Consider the extent to which war, suffering and fear are produced as distractions from campaigns to control and to further divide us.
Robert Kennedy Jr., long-time environmentalist and advocate for children’s health, said on Friday that government and media are to blame for the state of censorship and harms. Perhaps they are, in large part, but as I’ve learned during the Covid era, I agree more with his uncle’s challenge to us – that is: what more could we have been doing – how much blame do we share? How can we participate positively now?
Many of us, myself included, would have a hard time identifying, let alone boycotting or divesting in all of the companies, industries and government controls running this racket.
Some say the solution to this control is to build a “parallel society”. Good news, so-called parallel societies still exist – some are so large they were left undisturbed during Covid, and a vast list of people can be credited with their survival. People, past and present, who participate in various research and campaigns challenging prevailing “consensus science,” concerned with protecting freedom of speech, and open, honest debate and discovery are: Antoine Béchamp, Samuel Hahnemann, Florence Nightengale, Milton Rosenau, J.R. Crew, Weston Price, John Christopher, Ron Schmid, Kary Mullis, David Brownstein, Sally Fallon Morell, Tom Cowan, Andrew Kaufman, Stefan Lanka, Michael Yeadon, Paul Brodeur, and Arthur Firstenberg, just to name a few. As for what I’ll do, I’ve chosen to share my research, to share what I’ve learned from my own experience and from the extensive work of these people and from new friends I would have likely never met without Covid.
Another bit of good news. Last week, after 8 years and an unprecedented number of peer reviews and attempts to suppress its release, the National Toxicology Program released its 300+ page report concerning fluoride exposure, neurodevelopment, and cognition. NTP authors report of the 72 studies assessed, that of the 19 studies deemed high quality, “18 reported an inverse association between estimated fluoride exposure and IQ in children.” Similar to the NTP’s report on the toxicity of EMFs, the report concludes as expected with, “more studies are needed.”
If you are so inclined, please show your support for eliminating the fluoride mandate by attending the draft regulation hearing at 10 a.m. on Wednesday, Sept. 18, at the Nebraska State Office Building on M St. at Centennial Mall, lower level Meadowlark Conference Room.